On writing, erotica, character, soul stealers, philosophies, sensualities, and inspirations. And How To, if I can. -- www.Neale-Sourna.com, www.PIE-Percept.com, http://www.ProjectKeanu.com, www.AuthorsDen.com/nealesourna, www.CafeShops.com/NealeSourna, & www.Writing-Naked.com, www.CuntSinger.com
Tuesday, January 08, 2013
Sunday, December 30, 2012
Those shoes you can't / don't want to walk a mile in. Reminding us to see the unexpected and to position characters in not always in perfect comfort.
Those shoes you can't / don't want to walk a mile in. Reminding us to see the unexpected and to position characters in not always in perfect comfort.
http://shine.yahoo.com/the-thread-how-to/scariest-shoes-time-173900092.html
Scary Beautiful shoes by Leanie van der Vyver. Photo by Lyall Coburn
We've come across many ugly shoes in our day, but a pair dubbed "Scary Beautiful" is definitely the most treacherous footwear we've ever seen. The massive heels appear backwards on the foot, so the wearers feet point straight down the back, as if in ballet shoes, with their shin leaning against the front "heel" end of the design to balance. The shoes are a collaboration between artist Leanie van der Vyver and Dutch shoe designer René van den Berg, and serve as a commentary on today's impossible standards of beauty.
The ugliest shoes of all time
Van der Vyver is South African, and recently graduated from the Gerrit Rietveld Academie in Amsterdam. We spotted "Scary Beautiful" on her website, cargocollective.com, and reached out to her for the inside scoop.
Imelda Marcos' prized shoe collection is ruined
"After working in fashion for seven years, and therefore being well aware of the manipulation images in fashion suffer for a perfect result, I still compare myself to them and other current beauty ideals," Van der Vyver told Yahoo! Shine exclusively. "My frustration with my own inability to overcome these feelings of inadequacy was what brought 'Scary Beautiful' into fruition. The shoes formed part of my graduation project that was a result of my thesis. The conclusion of my thesis investigation was that people are not satisfied with what they look like, and that perfection, according to the beauty and fashion standards, has reached a climax. Humans are playing God by physically and metaphorically perfecting themselves. Beauty is currently at an all time climax, allowing this project to explore what lies beyond perfection. Scary Beautiful challenges current beauty ideals by inflicting an unexpected new beauty standard."
A model wearing the Scary Beautiful shoes. Photo by Lyall CoburnUnsurprisingly,
Van der Vyver's "Scary Beautiful" shoes were nominated for a design
prize at Gerrit Rietveld Academie. Jury members Barbara Visser, visual
artist and Xander Karskens, and curator of De Hallen had this to say
about the shoes:
"The object created by Leanie expands the concept of a shoe into multiple new meanings. The beautifully made leather object is accompanied by a video registration of a girl wearing it. One observes the design forcing the wearer to develop a new way of walking, leaning forward while refining a painfully fragile balance. The jury applauds the way aesthetics, ergonomics and prosthesis merge into an awkward choreography. The craftsmanship and strong conceptual way of designing also show in another work, a ceramic tea set in which reference is made to a building in South Africa. Leanie succeeds in translating political consciousness into form and is considered by the jury to be a meaningful future designer."
Alexander McQueen's spring 2010 Armadillo heels. Photo by Antonio de Moraes Barros Filho/Getty Images
We find the clip shocking but also oddly moving. The shoes are
obviously not practical, but as art they're intriguing. We can't help
but be reminded of Lady Gaga trying to steady herself in the now-famous
Alexander McQueen "Armadillo" heels in her "Bad Romance" music video.
Major models like Abbey Lee Kershaw, Natasha Poly, and Sasha Pivovarova
reportedly refused to wear the 12-inch McQueen heels out of fear, and
were cut from the designer's spring 2010 fashion show. In comparison,
the "Scary Beautiful" shoes make the "Armadillo" heels look like
sneakers, but we had a feeling the always-outdoing-herself Lady Gaga
would give them a spin one day. Sure enough, Van der Vyver confirmed our
suspicions.
"Yes, on request I did actually send them to Studio Formichetti for a Lady Gaga music video, but I could not get confirmation whether she actually used them," Van der Vyver told us. "I did not charge for her to possibly use them. I would love to sell them to a gallery."
We're holding out for the "Scary Beautiful" shoes to appear in an upcoming Lady Gaga music video, but until then Van der Vyver is back home in Cape Town starting her own studio where she'll continue investigating fashion and beauty. We're anticipating her next creation.
Check out a video below of a model walking verrry slowly in the "Scary Beautiful" shoes.
Scary Beautiful (Leanie van der Vyver) from Lyall Coburn on Vimeo.
Scary Beautiful (Leanie van der Vyver) from Lyall Coburn on Vimeo.
http://shine.yahoo.com/the-thread-how-to/scariest-shoes-time-173900092.html
The Scariest Shoes of All Time
By Joanna Douglas, Senior Fashion and Beauty Editor | How To – Tue, Oct 9, 2012 1:39 PM EDT
Yahoo! editors have selected this article as a
favorite of 2012. It first ran on Yahoo! Shine in October 2012, and
quickly garnered over 15,000 comments and became one of the 20 most-read
articles from the Yahoo! Front Page this year. Readers were shocked and
horrified by these treacherous backwards heels, calling them “Edward
Scissorfeet” or likening them to Natalie Portman’s broken legs in “Black
Swan.” Others appreciated the designer’s thought process, agreeing that
lengths women will go to for vanity is, in fact, quite scary.
Scary Beautiful shoes by Leanie van der Vyver. Photo by Lyall Coburn
We've come across many ugly shoes in our day, but a pair dubbed "Scary Beautiful" is definitely the most treacherous footwear we've ever seen. The massive heels appear backwards on the foot, so the wearers feet point straight down the back, as if in ballet shoes, with their shin leaning against the front "heel" end of the design to balance. The shoes are a collaboration between artist Leanie van der Vyver and Dutch shoe designer René van den Berg, and serve as a commentary on today's impossible standards of beauty.
The ugliest shoes of all time
Van der Vyver is South African, and recently graduated from the Gerrit Rietveld Academie in Amsterdam. We spotted "Scary Beautiful" on her website, cargocollective.com, and reached out to her for the inside scoop.
Imelda Marcos' prized shoe collection is ruined
"After working in fashion for seven years, and therefore being well aware of the manipulation images in fashion suffer for a perfect result, I still compare myself to them and other current beauty ideals," Van der Vyver told Yahoo! Shine exclusively. "My frustration with my own inability to overcome these feelings of inadequacy was what brought 'Scary Beautiful' into fruition. The shoes formed part of my graduation project that was a result of my thesis. The conclusion of my thesis investigation was that people are not satisfied with what they look like, and that perfection, according to the beauty and fashion standards, has reached a climax. Humans are playing God by physically and metaphorically perfecting themselves. Beauty is currently at an all time climax, allowing this project to explore what lies beyond perfection. Scary Beautiful challenges current beauty ideals by inflicting an unexpected new beauty standard."
A model wearing the Scary Beautiful shoes. Photo by Lyall CoburnUnsurprisingly,
Van der Vyver's "Scary Beautiful" shoes were nominated for a design
prize at Gerrit Rietveld Academie. Jury members Barbara Visser, visual
artist and Xander Karskens, and curator of De Hallen had this to say
about the shoes:
"The object created by Leanie expands the concept of a shoe into multiple new meanings. The beautifully made leather object is accompanied by a video registration of a girl wearing it. One observes the design forcing the wearer to develop a new way of walking, leaning forward while refining a painfully fragile balance. The jury applauds the way aesthetics, ergonomics and prosthesis merge into an awkward choreography. The craftsmanship and strong conceptual way of designing also show in another work, a ceramic tea set in which reference is made to a building in South Africa. Leanie succeeds in translating political consciousness into form and is considered by the jury to be a meaningful future designer."
Alexander McQueen's spring 2010 Armadillo heels. Photo by Antonio de Moraes Barros Filho/Getty Images
We find the clip shocking but also oddly moving. The shoes are
obviously not practical, but as art they're intriguing. We can't help
but be reminded of Lady Gaga trying to steady herself in the now-famous
Alexander McQueen "Armadillo" heels in her "Bad Romance" music video.
Major models like Abbey Lee Kershaw, Natasha Poly, and Sasha Pivovarova
reportedly refused to wear the 12-inch McQueen heels out of fear, and
were cut from the designer's spring 2010 fashion show. In comparison,
the "Scary Beautiful" shoes make the "Armadillo" heels look like
sneakers, but we had a feeling the always-outdoing-herself Lady Gaga
would give them a spin one day. Sure enough, Van der Vyver confirmed our
suspicions.
"Yes, on request I did actually send them to Studio Formichetti for a Lady Gaga music video, but I could not get confirmation whether she actually used them," Van der Vyver told us. "I did not charge for her to possibly use them. I would love to sell them to a gallery."
We're holding out for the "Scary Beautiful" shoes to appear in an upcoming Lady Gaga music video, but until then Van der Vyver is back home in Cape Town starting her own studio where she'll continue investigating fashion and beauty. We're anticipating her next creation.
Check out a video below of a model walking verrry slowly in the "Scary Beautiful" shoes.
Scary Beautiful (Leanie van der Vyver) from Lyall Coburn on Vimeo.
Scary Beautiful (Leanie van der Vyver) from Lyall Coburn on Vimeo.
Thursday, December 20, 2012
Your Computer and Cell Phone Brought to You by Poet Lord Byron's daughter and a Hollywood Star!
The daughter of Lord Byron invented the
grandparent programming of the computer you're using right now. And Ms.
Hedy Lamarr added her bit too. I love you Hedy!!!
Ada Byron, born today in 1815, was the daughter of the famous English poet, Lord Byron, and Annabella Milbanke. Her mother, Milbanke, was described as a religiously fervent woman with a penchant for mathematics, and her husband, Lord Byron, reportedly described her as his "princess of parallelograms."
Their daughter, Ada, inherited her father's mercurial temper, but her mother's mathematical skill. And it was fortunate she did so.
Today, Google is celebrating the 197th birthday of Ada Lovelace - considered to be the world's first computer programmer - with a homepage doodle that honors her contributions to computer science.
In 1835, Ada Byron married William King, her former mathematics tutor. King was later made the Earl of Lovelace, and Ada became known as the Countess of Lovelace; history, for some reason, attached “Lovelace” as her surname. Ada’s intelligence and social standing won her introductions to the leading minds of the day, and her friendship with scientific researcher Mary Somerville allowed her to meet the distinguished mathematician Charles Babbage, whose descriptions of a Difference Engine and, later, the Revolutionary Analytical Engine, essentially created the first computer.
But it was Lovelace’s translation of Luigi Menebrea’s account of the Analytical Engine that brought Lovelace fame. While the translation was admirable enough, it was Lovelace’s “notes” at the end - a dissection of the Engine’s potential as operation, as well as the first “computer program” describing how to use it - that justifies her place in history. Lovelace also had the lucky fortune of providing a scientific “exclusive,” - Babbage was reluctant to publish much on his invention, leaving Lovelace’s work to stand largely alone.
In some ways, Lovelace’s contributions to science mirror German actress Hedy Lamarr, who co-invented the early process of spread-spectrum communications, which uses frequency hopping to prevent interference among wireless communications. Unlike Lamarr, whose claim to fame was really as a film actress, Lovelace was well respected as a mathematician first and foremost.
According to Wikipedia, Ada Lovelace had three children, and had amassed considerable gambling debts before dying from cancer on Nov. 27, 1852. For more on her contributions, click through to the slideshow.
Do your characters have as much going on as these real women: Hedy Lamarr and Ada Byron King, Countess of Lovelace?
====
Ever cool Ms. Hedy Lamarr a computer programmer, too. Told you, I love you Hedy!!!
Antheil and Lamarr submitted the idea of a secret communication system in June 1941. On August 11, 1942, US Patent 2,292,387 was granted ... This early version of frequency hopping used a piano roll to change between 88
frequencies and was intended to make radio-guided torpedoes harder for
enemies to detect or jam....
The idea was not implemented in the USA until 1962, when it was used by U.S. military ships during a blockade of Cuba after the patent had expired....
In 1998, Ottawa wireless technology developer Wi-LAN, Inc. "acquired a 49 percent claim to the patent from Lamarr....
Lamarr's and Antheil's frequency-hopping idea serves as a basis for modern spread-spectrum communication technology, such as Bluetooth, COFDM used in Wi-Fi network connections, and CDMA used in some cordless and wireless telephones....
Lamarr wanted to join the National Inventors Council, but was reportedly told ... she could better help the war effort by using her celebrity status to sell War Bonds. [Ovarian prejudice, folks]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedy_Lamarr#Frequency-hopping_spread-spectrum_invention
Does Ms. Hedy look familiar to you?
For several years beginning in 1997, the boxes of CorelDRAW's software suites were graced by a large Corel-drawn image of Hedy Lamarr. The picture won CorelDRAW's yearly software suite cover design contest in 1996. Lamarr sued Corel for using the image without her permission. Corel countered that she did not own rights to the image. The parties reached an undisclosed settlement in 1998.[20][21]
For her contribution to the motion picture industry, Hedy Lamarr has a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame at 6247 Hollywood Blvd.[22]
How Ada Lovelace Shaped Computing
Ada Byron, later known as Ada Lovelace,
helped explain and analyze the potential for one of the great inventions
of her day, Charles Babbage’s Analytical Engine.
-
By Mark Hachman
- December 10, 2012
Ada Byron, born today in 1815, was the daughter of the famous English poet, Lord Byron, and Annabella Milbanke. Her mother, Milbanke, was described as a religiously fervent woman with a penchant for mathematics, and her husband, Lord Byron, reportedly described her as his "princess of parallelograms."
Their daughter, Ada, inherited her father's mercurial temper, but her mother's mathematical skill. And it was fortunate she did so.
Today, Google is celebrating the 197th birthday of Ada Lovelace - considered to be the world's first computer programmer - with a homepage doodle that honors her contributions to computer science.
In 1835, Ada Byron married William King, her former mathematics tutor. King was later made the Earl of Lovelace, and Ada became known as the Countess of Lovelace; history, for some reason, attached “Lovelace” as her surname. Ada’s intelligence and social standing won her introductions to the leading minds of the day, and her friendship with scientific researcher Mary Somerville allowed her to meet the distinguished mathematician Charles Babbage, whose descriptions of a Difference Engine and, later, the Revolutionary Analytical Engine, essentially created the first computer.
But it was Lovelace’s translation of Luigi Menebrea’s account of the Analytical Engine that brought Lovelace fame. While the translation was admirable enough, it was Lovelace’s “notes” at the end - a dissection of the Engine’s potential as operation, as well as the first “computer program” describing how to use it - that justifies her place in history. Lovelace also had the lucky fortune of providing a scientific “exclusive,” - Babbage was reluctant to publish much on his invention, leaving Lovelace’s work to stand largely alone.
In some ways, Lovelace’s contributions to science mirror German actress Hedy Lamarr, who co-invented the early process of spread-spectrum communications, which uses frequency hopping to prevent interference among wireless communications. Unlike Lamarr, whose claim to fame was really as a film actress, Lovelace was well respected as a mathematician first and foremost.
According to Wikipedia, Ada Lovelace had three children, and had amassed considerable gambling debts before dying from cancer on Nov. 27, 1852. For more on her contributions, click through to the slideshow.
Do your characters have as much going on as these real women: Hedy Lamarr and Ada Byron King, Countess of Lovelace?
====
Ever cool Ms. Hedy Lamarr a computer programmer, too. Told you, I love you Hedy!!!
Frequency-hopping spread-spectrum invention
The idea was not implemented in the USA until 1962, when it was used by U.S. military ships during a blockade of Cuba after the patent had expired....
In 1998, Ottawa wireless technology developer Wi-LAN, Inc. "acquired a 49 percent claim to the patent from Lamarr....
Lamarr's and Antheil's frequency-hopping idea serves as a basis for modern spread-spectrum communication technology, such as Bluetooth, COFDM used in Wi-Fi network connections, and CDMA used in some cordless and wireless telephones....
Lamarr wanted to join the National Inventors Council, but was reportedly told ... she could better help the war effort by using her celebrity status to sell War Bonds. [Ovarian prejudice, folks]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedy_Lamarr#Frequency-hopping_spread-spectrum_invention
Does Ms. Hedy look familiar to you?
For several years beginning in 1997, the boxes of CorelDRAW's software suites were graced by a large Corel-drawn image of Hedy Lamarr. The picture won CorelDRAW's yearly software suite cover design contest in 1996. Lamarr sued Corel for using the image without her permission. Corel countered that she did not own rights to the image. The parties reached an undisclosed settlement in 1998.[20][21]
For her contribution to the motion picture industry, Hedy Lamarr has a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame at 6247 Hollywood Blvd.[22]
Character: The #1 reason why you may be single is... By Kimberly Dawn Neumann
The #1 reason why you may be single is...
By Kimberly Dawn Neumann
“Is your family keeping you single?” could be the title of a reality
TV show these days. But the truth is, your relatives may actually have a
bigger influence on your dating life than you realize.
Not only are there the obvious issues that crop up (i.e., if they don’t like your new love interest, it’s going to be harder to make your relationship work), there are subtle familial maneuvers in play that may also affect how you come across to potential dates — or how you view romantic relationships in general.
“Most families want the best for us, so the way they interfere is probably unintentional,” says Karin Anderson, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Psychology at Concordia University Chicago and author of It Just Hasn’t Happened Yet. “Typically, family patterns are passed on from generation to generation, so your parents’ intrusive behavior is likely very similar to what they experienced themselves when they were dating, so they think that it’s normal and appropriate.” But knowing that doesn’t make it any easier to deal with — or help you in your quest to find The One.
So how can you best deal with relatives who become over-involved in your love life? Gently, but firmly! Boundaries may be considered a bit cliché at this point, but they are imperative for healthy family functioning — especially for single, adult children. “According to family systems theory, healthy = very close and very separate, meaning I’m close with family, but I maintain boundaries that permit my separateness, independence and personal space,” explains Dr. Anderson. “For some adults, finding this balance will be quite tricky — but to the extent that one makes efforts in this direction, he/she can expect to see improved health in other relationships.”
Family Issue #1: “Are you seeing anyone?” is the only question they ask you anymore
It’s the first thing you hear when you pick up the phone or visit for the holidays: “So, is there someone special in your life?” This constant questioning about your relationship status can not only drive you crazy, it could also affect your psyche (as in, making you feel like a failure if you can’t answer “yes” to their well-meaning queries). “Constantly having to defend your dating status is exhausting, and it takes all the fun out of sharing what’s going on in your love life. And sometimes, you might hang onto a boyfriend or girlfriend when you know the relationship isn’t going anywhere just to have a date for Thanksgiving so as to avoid the barrage of questions regarding your dating life,” says Dr. Anderson. “Your family’s over-involvement in your love life puts an enormous amount of pressure on you — whether you realize it or not.”
How to deal with it: Don’t bring home a lukewarm date just to appease your grandmother; that’s not fair to anyone, especially your guest. “If it bothers you that your family seems more interested in your dating life than in any other aspect of your existence, gently (but firmly) tell them that you’d prefer to discuss other matters and interests — your work, hobbies, travels, etc. — and that you’ll be the one to bring up your love life if there’s anything worth reporting,” advises Dr. Anderson.
Family Issue #2: You’re expected to attend all family events, which leaves little time for dating
Does your family expect to see you at every family get-together without exception — including your third cousin’s daughter’s graduation from kindergarten? “Some families see neglect and betrayal at every turn,” says Dr. Anderson. “They expect single adults to attend family get-togethers with the same frequency as any other family member, and frankly, this is neither possible nor desirable.” The reality is that dating takes up a lot of free time and energy for most people. Whether you’re searching online or otherwise, assessing your potential connection with dating prospects can often feel like a full-time job. Your family needs to cut you some slack and recognize that you’ll be unavailable for less-crucial gatherings every now and then. Giving in to their guilt trips may win you the “Aunt/Uncle of the Year” award, but sacrificing opportunities to meet The One isn’t helpful.
How to deal with it: Again, this is a boundary issue. “If your family continues to pressure you to attend every last event, gently (but firmly) explain that while you love them very much, you also need to devote time and attention to finding your life partner and building your own family,” suggests Dr. Anderson. “Especially if your parents met in 10th-grade algebra class, they won’t understand how time-intensive dating is, and their expectations about your level of involvement will likely be way off.” Furthermore, single adults need to spend quality time with others who are also single and looking for love. Hanging out at family reunions every summer may contribute to feelings of isolation and loneliness if you’re the only single person who’s there.
Family Issue #3: You still have unresolved emotional issues with your parents, and it’s affecting your ability to find a good partner
It sounds trite, but parents greatly affect the way people search for a life partner. “Typically, you’re attracted to dating partners in reaction to your relationship with an opposite-sex parent — or a same-sex parent, if you’re homosexual,” says Dr. Anderson. “If you’re lucky, this relationship was an emotionally healthy one and you’re looking to replicate these dynamics in an adult romantic relationship of your own.” Realistically, though, you’re often hoping to repair what wasn’t working with the relationship with your parents during adulthood. For example, a woman might say, “My dad was gone all the time and I never felt close to him, so I find myself dating men who are emotionally unavailable in hopes that this time around, I’ll get the intimacy I lacked with my own father.” Of course, this strategy rarely proves successful — and even if the lady in question were able to snag an emotionally unavailable man, would it make up for her dad’s lack of attention earlier in life? Furthermore, is it fair to burden any new partner with your unmet childhood emotional needs? Hardly!
How to deal with it: Identifying such patterns can prove extremely difficult — most people are too close to these issues to see them clearly without an outsider’s help. With concerns such as these, Dr. Anderson says that it’s best to get a recommendation from someone you trust and engage in some counseling, since there’s no better way to achieve personal growth and development. “Remember, you’re going to attract someone with roughly the same emotional health as your own; in therapy, we talk about water rising to its own level — meaning that in a relationship, one partner may appear to be the dysfunctional one, but ultimately, both are typically at about the same level of emotional health,” says Dr. Anderson. “So the healthier you are, the healthier the partner you ultimately end up with is likely to be.” In other words, work on your own issues if a happy relationship’s ultimately your goal.
Family Issue #4: Your family has set restrictive rules regarding who you can (and can’t) bring home as your date
Even in this day and age, certain families have rigid expectations about the people their relatives should date — and marry. “True story: One young man broke up with a girlfriend he adored who was of Irish decent because his Greek/Italian family insisted he marry within his own culture. He complied by marrying a woman of Greek heritage — and then divorced her after a miserable, 10-year marriage. Coincidentally, he ran across his former Irish girlfriend shortly after his divorce was final, and this time, he had the courage to follow his heart. Now he’s happily married,” relates Dr. Anderson. “Sounds like an old-school story, but such pressures are still alive and well in the new millennium.”
How to deal with it: All families have rules and opinions regarding touchy topics like your date’s religion, ethnicity, political affiliation or otherwise. Some families are quite permissive in their expectations of your future mate, while others remain rigidly stalwart. Dr. Anderson suggests paying attention to the messages your family members send regarding “acceptable” dating partners. Re-examine how these expectations have affected your dating life until now, whether it’s positively or negatively. For example: Are you ruling out prospects based on these archaic family rules? Do you avoid getting serious with someone because you know there’ll be hell to pay when you bring your date home for the holidays? “Remember, family members are responsible for their own happiness,” says Dr. Anderson. “It’s not your job to make sure everyone in your family approves of your partner.”
Family Issue #5: You’re estranged from your family and don’t interact with them at all
Are you emotionally disconnected from your family, for the most part? If so, you may believe that they couldn’t possibly affect your love life… but this isn’t always the case. “Oftentimes, people are still very much influenced by their family of origin, despite being disconnected from them,” says Dr. Anderson. “For example, you may unknowingly be looking for a substitute family, which could subtly affect who you desire to date.” On the other hand, your lack of contact with them could leave you with some relational deficits — especially if there was little communication within your family, even when you still lived at home. “You may never have learned how to appropriately attach to others or work through conflict in a healthy, productive way,” advises Dr. Anderson. “Also, psychologists who study families assert that if you’re cut off from your family of origin, aspects of your development will stagnate. So if you haven’t spoken to your family since you were 18, part of you remains ‘stuck’ at age 18.”
How to deal with it: It’s not fair, but people don’t choose their families — and some are dealt a doozy of a hand trying to deal with it. “Still, trying to stuff your dysfunctional family into a past that you’d rather ignore is a recipe for allowing your family’s lack of health to continue to plague you in the future,” says Dr. Anderson. “And remember, even if you’re able to successfully meet and marry someone, you’re likely to bring that untouched pathology into your marriage, thereby repeating the very patterns you’d hoped to leave behind.” This may be another case where professional help is truly the best course of action for you to take. Don’t let your family’s dysfunction ruin your chance at finding a happy, healthy, everlasting love, because in the end, it’s your relationship that matters most!
Kimberly Dawn Neumann (www.KDNeumann.com) is a popular New York City-based freelance writer whose work has appeared in such publications as Cosmopolitan, Marie Claire, Redbook, Maxim and frequently online. A certified dating/relationship coach, she’s published two books: The Real Reasons Men Commit and Sex Comes First and is the founder of www.DatingDivaDaily.com.
Article courtesy of Match.com.
Not only are there the obvious issues that crop up (i.e., if they don’t like your new love interest, it’s going to be harder to make your relationship work), there are subtle familial maneuvers in play that may also affect how you come across to potential dates — or how you view romantic relationships in general.
“Most families want the best for us, so the way they interfere is probably unintentional,” says Karin Anderson, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Psychology at Concordia University Chicago and author of It Just Hasn’t Happened Yet. “Typically, family patterns are passed on from generation to generation, so your parents’ intrusive behavior is likely very similar to what they experienced themselves when they were dating, so they think that it’s normal and appropriate.” But knowing that doesn’t make it any easier to deal with — or help you in your quest to find The One.
So how can you best deal with relatives who become over-involved in your love life? Gently, but firmly! Boundaries may be considered a bit cliché at this point, but they are imperative for healthy family functioning — especially for single, adult children. “According to family systems theory, healthy = very close and very separate, meaning I’m close with family, but I maintain boundaries that permit my separateness, independence and personal space,” explains Dr. Anderson. “For some adults, finding this balance will be quite tricky — but to the extent that one makes efforts in this direction, he/she can expect to see improved health in other relationships.”
Family Issue #1: “Are you seeing anyone?” is the only question they ask you anymore
It’s the first thing you hear when you pick up the phone or visit for the holidays: “So, is there someone special in your life?” This constant questioning about your relationship status can not only drive you crazy, it could also affect your psyche (as in, making you feel like a failure if you can’t answer “yes” to their well-meaning queries). “Constantly having to defend your dating status is exhausting, and it takes all the fun out of sharing what’s going on in your love life. And sometimes, you might hang onto a boyfriend or girlfriend when you know the relationship isn’t going anywhere just to have a date for Thanksgiving so as to avoid the barrage of questions regarding your dating life,” says Dr. Anderson. “Your family’s over-involvement in your love life puts an enormous amount of pressure on you — whether you realize it or not.”
How to deal with it: Don’t bring home a lukewarm date just to appease your grandmother; that’s not fair to anyone, especially your guest. “If it bothers you that your family seems more interested in your dating life than in any other aspect of your existence, gently (but firmly) tell them that you’d prefer to discuss other matters and interests — your work, hobbies, travels, etc. — and that you’ll be the one to bring up your love life if there’s anything worth reporting,” advises Dr. Anderson.
Family Issue #2: You’re expected to attend all family events, which leaves little time for dating
Does your family expect to see you at every family get-together without exception — including your third cousin’s daughter’s graduation from kindergarten? “Some families see neglect and betrayal at every turn,” says Dr. Anderson. “They expect single adults to attend family get-togethers with the same frequency as any other family member, and frankly, this is neither possible nor desirable.” The reality is that dating takes up a lot of free time and energy for most people. Whether you’re searching online or otherwise, assessing your potential connection with dating prospects can often feel like a full-time job. Your family needs to cut you some slack and recognize that you’ll be unavailable for less-crucial gatherings every now and then. Giving in to their guilt trips may win you the “Aunt/Uncle of the Year” award, but sacrificing opportunities to meet The One isn’t helpful.
How to deal with it: Again, this is a boundary issue. “If your family continues to pressure you to attend every last event, gently (but firmly) explain that while you love them very much, you also need to devote time and attention to finding your life partner and building your own family,” suggests Dr. Anderson. “Especially if your parents met in 10th-grade algebra class, they won’t understand how time-intensive dating is, and their expectations about your level of involvement will likely be way off.” Furthermore, single adults need to spend quality time with others who are also single and looking for love. Hanging out at family reunions every summer may contribute to feelings of isolation and loneliness if you’re the only single person who’s there.
Family Issue #3: You still have unresolved emotional issues with your parents, and it’s affecting your ability to find a good partner
It sounds trite, but parents greatly affect the way people search for a life partner. “Typically, you’re attracted to dating partners in reaction to your relationship with an opposite-sex parent — or a same-sex parent, if you’re homosexual,” says Dr. Anderson. “If you’re lucky, this relationship was an emotionally healthy one and you’re looking to replicate these dynamics in an adult romantic relationship of your own.” Realistically, though, you’re often hoping to repair what wasn’t working with the relationship with your parents during adulthood. For example, a woman might say, “My dad was gone all the time and I never felt close to him, so I find myself dating men who are emotionally unavailable in hopes that this time around, I’ll get the intimacy I lacked with my own father.” Of course, this strategy rarely proves successful — and even if the lady in question were able to snag an emotionally unavailable man, would it make up for her dad’s lack of attention earlier in life? Furthermore, is it fair to burden any new partner with your unmet childhood emotional needs? Hardly!
How to deal with it: Identifying such patterns can prove extremely difficult — most people are too close to these issues to see them clearly without an outsider’s help. With concerns such as these, Dr. Anderson says that it’s best to get a recommendation from someone you trust and engage in some counseling, since there’s no better way to achieve personal growth and development. “Remember, you’re going to attract someone with roughly the same emotional health as your own; in therapy, we talk about water rising to its own level — meaning that in a relationship, one partner may appear to be the dysfunctional one, but ultimately, both are typically at about the same level of emotional health,” says Dr. Anderson. “So the healthier you are, the healthier the partner you ultimately end up with is likely to be.” In other words, work on your own issues if a happy relationship’s ultimately your goal.
Family Issue #4: Your family has set restrictive rules regarding who you can (and can’t) bring home as your date
Even in this day and age, certain families have rigid expectations about the people their relatives should date — and marry. “True story: One young man broke up with a girlfriend he adored who was of Irish decent because his Greek/Italian family insisted he marry within his own culture. He complied by marrying a woman of Greek heritage — and then divorced her after a miserable, 10-year marriage. Coincidentally, he ran across his former Irish girlfriend shortly after his divorce was final, and this time, he had the courage to follow his heart. Now he’s happily married,” relates Dr. Anderson. “Sounds like an old-school story, but such pressures are still alive and well in the new millennium.”
How to deal with it: All families have rules and opinions regarding touchy topics like your date’s religion, ethnicity, political affiliation or otherwise. Some families are quite permissive in their expectations of your future mate, while others remain rigidly stalwart. Dr. Anderson suggests paying attention to the messages your family members send regarding “acceptable” dating partners. Re-examine how these expectations have affected your dating life until now, whether it’s positively or negatively. For example: Are you ruling out prospects based on these archaic family rules? Do you avoid getting serious with someone because you know there’ll be hell to pay when you bring your date home for the holidays? “Remember, family members are responsible for their own happiness,” says Dr. Anderson. “It’s not your job to make sure everyone in your family approves of your partner.”
Family Issue #5: You’re estranged from your family and don’t interact with them at all
Are you emotionally disconnected from your family, for the most part? If so, you may believe that they couldn’t possibly affect your love life… but this isn’t always the case. “Oftentimes, people are still very much influenced by their family of origin, despite being disconnected from them,” says Dr. Anderson. “For example, you may unknowingly be looking for a substitute family, which could subtly affect who you desire to date.” On the other hand, your lack of contact with them could leave you with some relational deficits — especially if there was little communication within your family, even when you still lived at home. “You may never have learned how to appropriately attach to others or work through conflict in a healthy, productive way,” advises Dr. Anderson. “Also, psychologists who study families assert that if you’re cut off from your family of origin, aspects of your development will stagnate. So if you haven’t spoken to your family since you were 18, part of you remains ‘stuck’ at age 18.”
How to deal with it: It’s not fair, but people don’t choose their families — and some are dealt a doozy of a hand trying to deal with it. “Still, trying to stuff your dysfunctional family into a past that you’d rather ignore is a recipe for allowing your family’s lack of health to continue to plague you in the future,” says Dr. Anderson. “And remember, even if you’re able to successfully meet and marry someone, you’re likely to bring that untouched pathology into your marriage, thereby repeating the very patterns you’d hoped to leave behind.” This may be another case where professional help is truly the best course of action for you to take. Don’t let your family’s dysfunction ruin your chance at finding a happy, healthy, everlasting love, because in the end, it’s your relationship that matters most!
Kimberly Dawn Neumann (www.KDNeumann.com) is a popular New York City-based freelance writer whose work has appeared in such publications as Cosmopolitan, Marie Claire, Redbook, Maxim and frequently online. A certified dating/relationship coach, she’s published two books: The Real Reasons Men Commit and Sex Comes First and is the founder of www.DatingDivaDaily.com.
Article courtesy of Match.com.
Friday, December 14, 2012
Limited time to LISTEN NOW: Bad dreams. Horrible news. Try this....
Bad dreams. Horrible news. Try this....
http://www.loveorabove.com/webinar/replay
http://www.loveorabove.com/webinar/replay
Saturday, December 08, 2012
Sarah Vaughan says, "Bye, Bye" lyrics to Peter Gunn Theme
Lyrics to Sarah Vaughan's Cover of Peter Gunn
Sarah Vaughan says, "Bye, Bye" to Peter Gunn
Sarah Vaghan first recorded Bye, Bye, the actual title of the song that adds lyrics written by Jay Livingston and Ray Evans to the Peter Gunn theme song, in 1964. Most versions don't include these lyrics, and some that do include both titles as most people don't identify the song as Bye, Bye
Every night your line is busy,
All that buzzin' makes me dizzy.
Couldn't count on all my fingers
All the dates you had with swingers.
Bye-bye.
Bye, baby.
I'm gonna kiss you goodbye
And walk right through that doorway.
So long.
I'm leaving.
This is the last time we'll meet
On the street going your way.
Don't look surprised
You know you've buttered your bread.
So now it's fair you should stare
At the back of my head.
If you write a letter to me
My former friend
Don't you end
With an R.S.V.P.
I'm goin' bye-bye
I'm moving!
Tomorrow I may be splittin'
To Britain or Norwas
I'm sayin' bye-bye
Bye, baby!
Now that I've heard all that jazz
Whereas I've had it, I've had it
I'm through now with you now
So baby it's au revouir
Adios, ciao, ciao, goodbye
All that buzzin' makes me dizzy.
Couldn't count on all my fingers
All the dates you had with swingers.
Bye-bye.
Bye, baby.
I'm gonna kiss you goodbye
And walk right through that doorway.
So long.
I'm leaving.
This is the last time we'll meet
On the street going your way.
Don't look surprised
You know you've buttered your bread.
So now it's fair you should stare
At the back of my head.
If you write a letter to me
My former friend
Don't you end
With an R.S.V.P.
I'm goin' bye-bye
I'm moving!
Tomorrow I may be splittin'
To Britain or Norwas
I'm sayin' bye-bye
Bye, baby!
Now that I've heard all that jazz
Whereas I've had it, I've had it
I'm through now with you now
So baby it's au revouir
Adios, ciao, ciao, goodbye
Max Sedgley Remix at YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kf17nKtllW
Friday, December 07, 2012
Six Essential Issues in Any Ebook Contract Negotiation by Deanna Utroske / http://www.digitalbookworld.com
Six Essential Issues in Any Ebook Contract Negotiation
For more information on ebook royalties, contracts and negotiations, attend Digital Book World 2013 in New York in January.
—
Publishers and authors are shaping new standard contracts as the industry shifts toward digital-first and e-original book publishing.
As opposed to big publishers, which are thought to pay authors a standard ebook royalty of 25%, new independent ebook publishers like The Atavist, Open Road Media and OR Books, can and do pay authors substantially more. But, on what terms? And, royalties aren’t the only issue at hand as a new publishing landscape emerges.
There are six basic issues at stake in an ebook contract negotiation:
1. Duration
2. Territory
3. Consent
4. E-functionality
5. Medium
6. Royalty
Basically, these issues add up to answering the following questions for the publisher (and the author):
- What can I do with this intellectual property?
- How long can I do it for?
- What cut of it am I going to get?
The contract, as proposed by a hypothetical independent publisher in the mock negotiation, described the property — the ebook under discussion — as “a previously unpublished book, which includes photographs and illustrations.” Schefler and Stein’s conversation followed basic negotiation strategies and revealed emerging ebook contract precedents.
Duration
Digital technology moves swiftly, and rapid content delivery and speedy adaptation to new opportunities looks to be the new norm.
Matters of duration address the time frame that governs the commitments in an ebook contract.
– How long will the contract remain in effect?
In our example, the publisher stipulated that rights would comprise “The exclusive right for the full term of copyright and all extensions and renewals….” And the author countered by offering instead “The exclusive right for five years from the date hereof….”
Similarly, the author and publisher need to answer:
– How much time can elapse between manuscript acceptance and publication? For an ebook this can be a matter of months, in contrast to 18 months for conventional print books.
– How much time does the publisher have to produce alternate formats allowed by the contract?
– How long until the rights revert back to author, before the contract term expires organically. This is contingent upon more than duration alone: It involves time passed since initial publication, the agreed upon definition of “out-of-print,” and a minimum level of annual author earnings.
Territory
Independent ebook publishers rarely have the resources to translate their publications but seek World rights in English as a matter of course.
Authors may choose to limit this territory — to only the U.S. or North America for instance. In this negotiation, the author proposed adding qualifiers like “English-language” and “English-language editions of” in nearly every section of the contract to clarify that the publisher didn’t have the rights to translate the ebook for non-English markets.
Consent
Evolving digital platforms and shorter production schedules lend themselves to quick, shrewd decisions.
Throughout an ebook contract, the publisher favors using their own discretion at decision points: Using the ebook content in-full or in-part in any form; and regarding the design, cover, and title of the ebook, for instance.
Thus, the publisher strategically benefits from phrases like “in the Publisher’s judgment.”
In contrast, the author pushes for disclaimers like, “subject to Author’s prior written approval in each instance” or simply, “subject to Author’s approval.”
If, when, and how consent is required during the term of contract is carefully described in each relevant section.
E-functionality
Each device and e-reading ecosystem features unique (and often proprietary) functionality. To ensure that an ebook can remain available, publishers often prefer the rights to define and enable these features broadly: “functionality features available for any applicable electronic or digital device or other distribution system now known or hereafter created.”
An author’s concern that advancing technology could infringe on opportunities for unique product development make it wise to narrowly define approved functionality.
What’s challenging here is anticipating and describing the future. Established publishers feel they lost revenue when the digital transition made ebook rights of their long-standing back-list titles available to other publishers. They’ve learned that contracts that outline rights to content “in book form” aren’t specific enough.
In an effort to close the stable door after the horse has bolted, publishers now seek rights to develop book content in all prospective media, known and unknown. Authors generally don’t want to relinquish those prospects ad infinitum.
A flexible compromise must be struck that suits the time frame of the contract and the priorities of each party.
Medium
The ebook, evolving new media, and emerging channels for content sharing and distribution make for an animated debate around “what is a book?”
The formats, features, enhancements, and iterations that an ebook can take must be thoughtfully defined in an ebook contract.
Of particular importance are what adaptations and apps can be developed by each party and what percentage of the ebook content the author can use commercially as well as what constitutes competitive works.
Can a publisher that acquires the rights to a travel ebook also develop an app from that content, which adds, say, video and site-specific historical information, let’s users build a profile, upload personal travel photos and plot their next journey?
Can the author give away sample chapters of that travel ebook to promote her next project?
Can the author arrange for the production and sale of a DVD version of the book that’s simply a dramatic reading of the text and tasteful video of the images included in the ebook?
In the mock negotiation, contested media included, “links to web sites…sound recordings, literary, pictorial, graphic, and non-dramatic audio visual material” and “enhancements…such as sound, images, animation, interactivity…audiovisual elements [and] apps.” Also under consideration were the parameters of audio rights — “non-dramatic, single-reader” as opposed to “dramatic, multi-reader.” Essentially, any presentation of the ebook content that goes beyond mimicking a conventional print book is carefully allocated.
Additionally the author, generally, cannot compete with the publisher through comparable works. During the term of contract, the author cannot sell a product that will diminish the value of the publisher’s rights to the ebook. So it should be clear that whatever adapted ebook or (new) media rights the author retains, when exploited, would not constitute competition with the publisher.
Royalty
Ebook royalties run the gamut from 0% to 100% depending on an authors’ chosen publication and distribution channel.
A contract with an independent ebook publisher will take up what percent of the publisher’s net revenue the author will receive, if this rate will increase to after the publisher recoups plant costs (production, design, editorial, etc.), and whether the author can exercise an option to receive the publisher’s current standard rate, should it increase — this falls under a most-favored-nation clause, where the publisher will allow the author to enjoy royalties at least as good as those generally paid to other authors.
Large publishers pay between 25% and 40%, while self-published authors can command upward of 70%. Independent publishers, such as Other Press and Rosetta Books, are likely to pay in the 50% range.
Knowing that major publishers pay in the 25% range, independent ebook publishers can incent their services by offering a higher rate.
—
As independent publishers capitalize on digital-first and e-original publishing opportunities and large houses, like Random House and HarperCollins launch digital-only imprints, ebook contracts and these six issues will shape the future of digital publishing. Yet even as the contracts progress, the issues will linger; authors and publishers will focus on what can be done with the content, how long the rights last, and how much of the profit they will get.
—
For more information on ebook royalties, contracts and negotiations, attend Digital Book World 2013 in New York in January.
Image Credit: Negotiation image via Shutterstock
About DeannaUtroske
Deanna Utroske is the Content Producer at Digital Book World and an active member of New York Women in Communications, where she serves on the Integrated Marketing & Communications Committee. Previously, Deanna worked in the editorial office of Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, a publication of the University of Chicago Press.Monday, December 03, 2012
On Authors Being Undercut by Others_Stephenie Meyer's "Midnight Sun"_Edward's Version of Twilight
Midnight Sun: Edward's Version of Twilight
August 28, 2008 [still undone Dec 2012]
As some of you may have heard, my partial draft of Midnight Sun was illegally posted on the Internet and has since been virally distributed without my knowledge or permission or the knowledge or permission of my publisher.
I have a good idea of how the leak happened as there were very few copies of Midnight Sun that left my possession and each was unique. Due to little changes I made to the manuscript at different times, I can tell when each left my possession and to whom it was given. The manuscript that was illegally distributed on the Internet was given to trusted individuals for a good purpose. I have no comment beyond that as I believe that there was no malicious intent with the initial distribution.
I did not want my readers to experience Midnight Sun before it was completed, edited and published. I think it is important for everybody to understand that what happened was a huge violation of my rights as an author, not to mention me as a human being. As the author of the Twilight Saga, I control the copyright and it is up to the owner of the copyright to decide when the books should be made public; this is the same for musicians and filmmakers.
Just because someone buys a book or movie or song, or gets a download off the Internet, doesn't mean that they own the right to reproduce and distribute it. Unfortunately, with the Internet, it is easy for people to obtain and share items that do not legally belong to them. No matter how this is done, it is still dishonest. This has been a very upsetting experience for me, but I hope it will at least leave my fans with a better understanding of copyright and the importance of artistic control.
So where does this leave Midnight Sun? My first feeling was that there was no way to continue. Writing isn't like math; in math, two plus two always equals four no matter what your mood is like. With writing, the way you feel changes everything. If I tried to write Midnight Sun now, in my current frame of mind, James would probably win and all the Cullens would die, which wouldn't dovetail too well with the original story. In any case, I feel too sad about what has happened to continue working on Midnight Sun, and so it is on hold indefinitely.
I'd rather my fans not read this version of Midnight Sun. It was only an incomplete draft; the writing is messy and flawed and full of mistakes. But how do I comment on this violation without driving more people to look for the illegal posting? It has taken me a while to decide how and if I could respond.
But to end the confusion, I've decided to make the draft available here (at the end of this post). This way, my readers don't have to feel they have to make a sacrifice to stay honest. I hope this fragment gives you further insight into Edward's head and adds a new dimension to the Twilight story. That's what inspired me to write it in the first place.
I do want to take a moment and thank the wonderful fans who have been so supportive of me over the past three years. I cannot begin to tell you how much each of you means to me. I only hope this note will stop all the confusion and online speculation so that the Twilight universe can once again become the happy escape it used to be. After this incredibly busy year, I am now focusing on spending more time with my family and working on some other writing projects.
--Stephenie
Midnight Sun Partial Draft (if you are having problems viewing it, please click here.) This material is copyrighted by Stephenie Meyer. Any retranscription or reproduction is illegal.
____________________________________________________
June 2008 Update: In response to the outrageous number of emails that I have received with questions concerning Midnight Sun, I talked to Stephenie this weekend and she asked me to let everyone know that Midnight Sun is her next project. She has not yet finished writing it (and there is no timeline set up, so we all need to put a lot of effort into being patient for a while longer), but she is definitely still planning on having it published. And, after Breaking Dawn comes out, Stephenie will have much more time to focus on writing Midnight Sun.
____________________________________________________
Midnight Sun is an exercise in character development that got wildly out of hand (as do many of my projects).
While I was procrastinating some real editing work (I'm always at my most creative when procrastinating), I started to wonder how the first chapter of Twilight would read if it were written from Edward's perspective. There is so much more to his side of the story than there is to Bella's in that first chapter. After all, Bella only knows that an incredibly gorgeous boy is looking at her funny.
Meanwhile, Edward is suffering through one of the most momentous days of his very long life! First there's the shock and frustration of not being able to hear Bella's thoughts, then the wild, monstrous reaction to her scent, followed by the incredible expenditure of self-control that it takes to not kill her... His side of Bella's first day at Forks High School is a hundred times more exciting than her own.
Though I didn't have time to work on it right away, the idea of letting Edward have his chance to speak stuck with me. I couldn't shake it. I found myself thinking his words in the middle of the night and jotting down phrases he would use while I was waiting in line at the post office. As soon as I finished my real work, I sat down and let Edward get his say.
Writing chapter one, "First Sight," from Edward's point of view was an exciting experience; I actually had my pulse racing as I typed. When I finished, I was truly pleased with my creation. Here was the other side of the story that no one knew. Here was the truth of what Edward had been through. I felt like I knew my Edward even better, and I was sure his dialogue would be more insightful in future novels. The end. Exercise over.
Ha ha. It wasn't long before I was thinking about Edward in Alaska, Edward upon his return to Forks, Edward's side of that fateful conversation in Biology... Chapter two started to write itself in my head, while I kept telling myself that I didn't have time to write a book for fun when I had real books to write. (My mother seconded that opinion—she thinks I work too hard).
But when a story demands to be written, there's no way to resist. And the more I wrote, the more I became convinced that Edward deserved to have his story told. At first I was planning to post it all here on my website, but I changed my mind for two reasons, the most important being that Edward's version is much longer than Bella's—Edward over-thinks everything. I'm not even half way done, and the page count is near three hundred.
The second reason that I changed my mind is a little bit silly—I just would really love to have a pretty, matching, bound version of Midnight Sun to put beside Twilight on top of my desk. So I'm going to try to have it published as a complementary novel to Twilight.
It will take a while, because I can only work on it between editing stints, but I hope that someday I'll be able to see Midnight Sun on the bookstore shelves next to Twilight, New Moon, Eclipse, and etc... (Fueling my belief that Midnight Sun is worthy of publishing is my mother's about face—after reading the first eleven chapters, she thinks it's magic and says I should go for it.)
And here I was going to write just a short paragraph of introduction. You see what I mean about things getting out of hand?
Because I just can't wait out the years it will take to reach publication for people to begin to understand Edward, here is my original character development exercise, Edward's version of Bella's first day at Forks High School, the first chapter of Midnight Sun*:
Midnight Sun Chapter 1 (if you are having problems viewing it, please click here.) This material is copyrighted by Stephenie Meyer. Any retranscription or reproduction is illegal.
*Please remember this is an unedited rough draft. It is full of typos and all the other flaws that unedited manuscripts have. Enjoy it for what it is, but know that the final copy will be infinitely superior.
Monday, November 26, 2012
One of the BEST takes on a man's life I've ever heard penned in song: Passion Pit's "Take a Walk"
One of the BEST takes on a man's life I've ever heard penned in song: Passion Pit's "Take a Walk" without being overwrought and melodramatic. This isn't "Patches." Don't watch it; just listen to the lyrics and how they're sung; it's like listening to human history that's still fresh today_and as it turns out, we are and it is.
All these kinds of places
Make it seem like it's been ages
And tomorrow's sun and buildings scrape the sky.
I love this country dearly
I can feel the latter clearly
But I never thought I'd be alone to try.
Once I was outside Penn station
Selling red and white carnations
We were still alone, my wife and I.
Before we married, saved my money
Brought my dear wife over.
Now I work to bring my family stateside.
Got off the boat, they stayed a while
then scattered 'cross the coast.
Once a year I'll see them for a week or so at most.
I took a walk
Ohh-ohh-ohh-ohh-ohh-ohh-ohh
Practice isn't perfect
but the market cuts a loss.
I remind myself that times could be much worse.
My wife won't ask me questions-
there's not so much to ask.
And she'll never flaunt around an empty purse.
What's my mother lacking
Just to stay a couple nights
And decided she would stay the rest of her life.
And watch my little children
Play some boardgame in the kitchen
And I sit and pray they never feel my strife.
But then my partner called to say the pension funds were gone
He made some bad investments, now the accounts are overdrawn
I took a walk.
Ohh-ohh-ohh-ohh-ohh-ohh-ohh
Honey, it's your son, I think I borrowed just too much.
We had taxes, we had bills, we had a lifestyle to front.
And tonight I swear I'll come home and we'll make love like we're young.
But tomorrow , you'll cook dinner for the neighbors and their kids.
We can rip apart the socialists and all their damn taxes.
You'll see I am no criminal, I'm down on both bad knees.
I'm just too much a coward to admit when I'm in need.
I took a walk.
(take a walk, take a walk, take a walk)
(take a walk, take a walk, take a walk)
Ohh-ohh-ohh-ohh
I took a walk
(take a walk, take a walk, take a walk)
(take a walk, take a walk, take a walk)
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Take_a_Walk_%28Passion_Pit_song%29
All these kinds of places
Make it seem like it's been ages
And tomorrow's sun and buildings scrape the sky.
I love this country dearly
I can feel the latter clearly
But I never thought I'd be alone to try.
Once I was outside Penn station
Selling red and white carnations
We were still alone, my wife and I.
Before we married, saved my money
Brought my dear wife over.
Now I work to bring my family stateside.
Got off the boat, they stayed a while
then scattered 'cross the coast.
Once a year I'll see them for a week or so at most.
I took a walk
Ohh-ohh-ohh-ohh-ohh-ohh-ohh
Practice isn't perfect
but the market cuts a loss.
I remind myself that times could be much worse.
My wife won't ask me questions-
there's not so much to ask.
And she'll never flaunt around an empty purse.
What's my mother lacking
Just to stay a couple nights
And decided she would stay the rest of her life.
And watch my little children
Play some boardgame in the kitchen
And I sit and pray they never feel my strife.
But then my partner called to say the pension funds were gone
He made some bad investments, now the accounts are overdrawn
I took a walk.
Ohh-ohh-ohh-ohh-ohh-ohh-ohh
Honey, it's your son, I think I borrowed just too much.
We had taxes, we had bills, we had a lifestyle to front.
And tonight I swear I'll come home and we'll make love like we're young.
But tomorrow , you'll cook dinner for the neighbors and their kids.
We can rip apart the socialists and all their damn taxes.
You'll see I am no criminal, I'm down on both bad knees.
I'm just too much a coward to admit when I'm in need.
I took a walk.
(take a walk, take a walk, take a walk)
(take a walk, take a walk, take a walk)
Ohh-ohh-ohh-ohh
I took a walk
(take a walk, take a walk, take a walk)
(take a walk, take a walk, take a walk)
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Take_a_Walk_%28Passion_Pit_song%29
Friday, November 23, 2012
'Lincoln' Women: How Sally Field, Gloria Reuben, and S. Epatha Merkerson Stole Daniel Day-Lewis' Show By Brent Lang
'Lincoln' Women: How Sally Field, Gloria Reuben, and S. Epatha Merkerson Stole Daniel Day-Lewis' Show By Brent Lang
Steven Spielberg's "Lincoln" is, on the face of it, a standard "great man" biopic. Basked in a honeydew light, overflowing with sage advice, Daniel Day-Lewis' Great Emancipator is depicted as constantly and self-consciously speaking to the ages well before he belongs to them.
But let us now praise the film's not-as-famous women. For what rescues "Lincoln" from bombast are the slier and subtler performances by a trio of fantastic and often under-utilized actresses -- Sally Field, Gloria Reuben and S. Epatha Merkerson.
Each one uses her limited screen time to etch a devastating portrait of the limitations that faced women in a male-dominated society. After all, if the legislators debating the merits of the 13th Amendment in the movie fret openly that abolishing slavery will begin a slippery slope to black enfranchisement, they seem even more horrified at the prospect that it one day might lead to granting women the right to vote.
Though some critics have griped about Spielberg's penchant for speechifying in "Lincoln," there has been near universal praise for Day-Lewis and for Tommy Lee Jones' work as the wily Thaddeus Stevens. Field's take on First Lady Mary Todd Lincoln -- a woman Louis C.K. quipped on "Saturday Night Live" recently was "historically insane" -- has been more divisive.
In TheWrap, for instance, Steve Pond wrote, "Sally Field may well be nominated for Supporting Actress for her Mary Todd Lincoln, but to me her hysteria was one of the least-successful parts of the film."
Yet Field's work is in many ways more revelatory than that of Day-Lewis. True, the Irish-Anglo acting god daringly gives the 16th president a historically accurate high voice and indelibly paints a picture of a great orator with an outhouse sense of humor, but his modifications are slight tweaks to the Lincoln myth. Field's interpretation is a whole-scale reinvention.
Field's Mary is privately unhinged, true. But she is also a smooth Washington operator, comfortable sparring with Stevens over her White House redecorating and forcibly pressuring her husband to carry the 13th Amendment to the finish line while wielding little more than a fan.
Even her mania is rooted in the death of her young son Willy; an empathetic anchor that keeps Mary from becoming simply the backwoods, social-climbing hysteric she's been portrayed as in the past.
In screenwriter Tony Kushner, Field finds an eager co-conspirator. As Kushner confessed on NPR, the Lincolns had a turbulent relationship in part because of Abraham Lincoln's emotional coldness.
"People always think about Mary as being difficult and she absolutely was, but Lincoln wasn't easy either," Kushner said. "He was remote and complicated and rather interestingly fond of telling her things that would upset her horribly, like these dreams that he kept having and he would leave her kind of in a state night after night, telling her that he was having these kind of scary dreams.
It's an enormously complicated relationship and the family is a tragic family."
The only false note in an otherwise galvanizing portrayal, is having Mary deliver a line that is a too historically self-aware.
"All anyone will remember about me was that I was crazy and ruined your happiness," Mary says at one point -- to which my companion let forth a large guffaw.
Field who packed 25 pounds onto her slender frame and allowed the camera to scan her creased face is a revelation -- it's a reminder that the plucky star of "Norma Rae" is good for more than Boniva ads.
But Mary Todd Lincoln isn't the only female who elbows her way into this big screen men's club. Gloria Reuben's Elizabeth Keckley is also a marvel.
Dramaturgically it's a thankless role with Reuben's freed slave seamstress frequently used as a stand-in for all-antebellum African American suffering. Yet Reuben grounds the performance in a simmering fury and heartbreak, using her eyes to register the pangs of hurt that greets the racist slights Keckley is exposed to on a daily basis.
Her conversation in the White House portico with Daniel Day-Lewis about the meaning of emancipation is a bravura moment -- a reminder of just how long a walk to freedom 19th century blacks faced.
Likewise, S. Epatha Merkerson's Lydia Smith is perhaps the greatest master class in doing a lot with a little since Judi Dench captured a Best Supporting Actress Oscar in 1998 for her eight-minute cameo in "Shakespeare in Love."
Smith, the housekeeper and (spoiler alert) common-law wife of Thaddeus Stevens, has two fleeting scenes. In one, she gently removes Jones' coat as he enters their Washington, D.C., home after the amendment passes, in the other she reads the constitutional addition aloud in bed to her secret-paramour. It is, in the words of another Kushner play [Angels in America _ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angels_in_America:_A_Gay_Fantasia_on_National_Themes & http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0318997/], a reminder that "the world only spins forward."
Indeed, the entire film represents a major step forward for Spielberg whose earlier boy's adventures were largely all-male affairs. Aside from Embeth Davidtz's frightened maid in "Schindler's List," Whoopi Goldberg's martyr-like Celie in "The Color Purple" and Karen Allen's fiery adventurer in "Raiders of the Lost Ark," the Spielberg women are a weightless bunch. Even great actresses like Julianne Moore in "The Lost World" are given gossamer thin screen time.
Here, transported by Kushner's words, he allows these women to step forward out of the shadows and into history. Next time maybe he'll let them take center stage.
http://www.thewrap.com/awards/article/lincoln-women-how-sally-field-and-gloria-reuben-stole-daniel-day-lewis-show-65666
Steven Spielberg's "Lincoln" is, on the face of it, a standard "great man" biopic. Basked in a honeydew light, overflowing with sage advice, Daniel Day-Lewis' Great Emancipator is depicted as constantly and self-consciously speaking to the ages well before he belongs to them.
But let us now praise the film's not-as-famous women. For what rescues "Lincoln" from bombast are the slier and subtler performances by a trio of fantastic and often under-utilized actresses -- Sally Field, Gloria Reuben and S. Epatha Merkerson.
Each one uses her limited screen time to etch a devastating portrait of the limitations that faced women in a male-dominated society. After all, if the legislators debating the merits of the 13th Amendment in the movie fret openly that abolishing slavery will begin a slippery slope to black enfranchisement, they seem even more horrified at the prospect that it one day might lead to granting women the right to vote.
Though some critics have griped about Spielberg's penchant for speechifying in "Lincoln," there has been near universal praise for Day-Lewis and for Tommy Lee Jones' work as the wily Thaddeus Stevens. Field's take on First Lady Mary Todd Lincoln -- a woman Louis C.K. quipped on "Saturday Night Live" recently was "historically insane" -- has been more divisive.
In TheWrap, for instance, Steve Pond wrote, "Sally Field may well be nominated for Supporting Actress for her Mary Todd Lincoln, but to me her hysteria was one of the least-successful parts of the film."
Yet Field's work is in many ways more revelatory than that of Day-Lewis. True, the Irish-Anglo acting god daringly gives the 16th president a historically accurate high voice and indelibly paints a picture of a great orator with an outhouse sense of humor, but his modifications are slight tweaks to the Lincoln myth. Field's interpretation is a whole-scale reinvention.
Field's Mary is privately unhinged, true. But she is also a smooth Washington operator, comfortable sparring with Stevens over her White House redecorating and forcibly pressuring her husband to carry the 13th Amendment to the finish line while wielding little more than a fan.
Even her mania is rooted in the death of her young son Willy; an empathetic anchor that keeps Mary from becoming simply the backwoods, social-climbing hysteric she's been portrayed as in the past.
In screenwriter Tony Kushner, Field finds an eager co-conspirator. As Kushner confessed on NPR, the Lincolns had a turbulent relationship in part because of Abraham Lincoln's emotional coldness.
"People always think about Mary as being difficult and she absolutely was, but Lincoln wasn't easy either," Kushner said. "He was remote and complicated and rather interestingly fond of telling her things that would upset her horribly, like these dreams that he kept having and he would leave her kind of in a state night after night, telling her that he was having these kind of scary dreams.
It's an enormously complicated relationship and the family is a tragic family."
The only false note in an otherwise galvanizing portrayal, is having Mary deliver a line that is a too historically self-aware.
"All anyone will remember about me was that I was crazy and ruined your happiness," Mary says at one point -- to which my companion let forth a large guffaw.
Field who packed 25 pounds onto her slender frame and allowed the camera to scan her creased face is a revelation -- it's a reminder that the plucky star of "Norma Rae" is good for more than Boniva ads.
But Mary Todd Lincoln isn't the only female who elbows her way into this big screen men's club. Gloria Reuben's Elizabeth Keckley is also a marvel.
Dramaturgically it's a thankless role with Reuben's freed slave seamstress frequently used as a stand-in for all-antebellum African American suffering. Yet Reuben grounds the performance in a simmering fury and heartbreak, using her eyes to register the pangs of hurt that greets the racist slights Keckley is exposed to on a daily basis.
Her conversation in the White House portico with Daniel Day-Lewis about the meaning of emancipation is a bravura moment -- a reminder of just how long a walk to freedom 19th century blacks faced.
Likewise, S. Epatha Merkerson's Lydia Smith is perhaps the greatest master class in doing a lot with a little since Judi Dench captured a Best Supporting Actress Oscar in 1998 for her eight-minute cameo in "Shakespeare in Love."
Smith, the housekeeper and (spoiler alert) common-law wife of Thaddeus Stevens, has two fleeting scenes. In one, she gently removes Jones' coat as he enters their Washington, D.C., home after the amendment passes, in the other she reads the constitutional addition aloud in bed to her secret-paramour. It is, in the words of another Kushner play [Angels in America _ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angels_in_America:_A_Gay_Fantasia_on_National_Themes & http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0318997/], a reminder that "the world only spins forward."
Indeed, the entire film represents a major step forward for Spielberg whose earlier boy's adventures were largely all-male affairs. Aside from Embeth Davidtz's frightened maid in "Schindler's List," Whoopi Goldberg's martyr-like Celie in "The Color Purple" and Karen Allen's fiery adventurer in "Raiders of the Lost Ark," the Spielberg women are a weightless bunch. Even great actresses like Julianne Moore in "The Lost World" are given gossamer thin screen time.
Here, transported by Kushner's words, he allows these women to step forward out of the shadows and into history. Next time maybe he'll let them take center stage.
http://www.thewrap.com/awards/article/lincoln-women-how-sally-field-and-gloria-reuben-stole-daniel-day-lewis-show-65666
Monday, November 12, 2012
New Extended Version_Dia's TeamBang (3)_GOING ON SALE SOON!!
Cheerleader Dia's the only girl on a
busload of horny boys, she can't stand, because their teacher / coach,
Mr. Dean, is the man she'd open her firm thighs wide for anytime and
anywhere, and already has, so he'd allow her to be "alone" with him, in
back of the dark team bus, on the long, after game ride home.
But, Mr. Dean has a banging surprise planned for
tender Dia, and for his winning, all-male team. There will be fun for
all: sexy, young cheerleader Dia, his fit and well-deserving sports
champions, their beloved coach, and even a big, surprise guest.
Thursday, November 08, 2012
answer to establishing copyright for a character or creative work
In answer to establishing copyright for a character or creative work:
For legal backup reference to establish official US/world copyright, LOC is the way, especially if anyone is suing _
http://www.copyright.gov/eco/ online Library of Congress registry;
http://www.copyright.gov/forms/formpa.pdf for performing arts copyright (film, TV, music, choreography, screenplays, etc.);
http://www.copyright.gov/forms/formtx.pdf copyrighting literary (fiction, nonfiction, catalog, textbooks, etc.);
also, for establishing ownership within US entertainment there is WGA http://www.wgawregistry.org/webrss/
LOC has the greater weight and world reach.
For legal backup reference to establish official US/world copyright, LOC is the way, especially if anyone is suing _
http://www.copyright.gov/eco/ online Library of Congress registry;
http://www.copyright.gov/forms/formpa.pdf for performing arts copyright (film, TV, music, choreography, screenplays, etc.);
http://www.copyright.gov/forms/formtx.pdf copyrighting literary (fiction, nonfiction, catalog, textbooks, etc.);
also, for establishing ownership within US entertainment there is WGA http://www.wgawregistry.org/webrss/
LOC has the greater weight and world reach.
Wednesday, November 07, 2012
Books › Kindle Edition › "neale sourna"
1.
Neale Sourna's SexSinger: Cunnilingus_How to Give Head (Oral Sex and Eating Pussy), for Giving Women Orgasms of Cuntlicious Joy! Info and Games! by Neale Sourna (Oct 17, 2011)
| Formats | Price | New | Used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $9.97 |
2.
Neale Sourna's CuntSinger: Cunnilingus: How to Give Head (Oral Sex and Eating Pussy), for Giving Women Orgasms of Cuntlicious Joy! by Neale Sourna (May 24, 2009)
| Formats | Price | New | Used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $9.97 |
3.
Hobble by Neale Sourna (Aug 14, 2007)
| Formats | Price | New | Used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $9.59 | ||||
| Paperback
Order in the next 12 hours to get it by Thursday, Nov 8.
Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping.
|
$16.95 | $74.73 |
4.
NCAD-v3n1.1--Neale Sourna's North Coast Academies' Diary--Sascha: Public Parking, Sex Squared by Neale Sourna (Dec 18, 2008)
| Formats | Price | New | Used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $6.25 |
5.
Neale Sourna's North Coast Academies' Diary, Volume 2, Number 1--Ross: Daddy's Little Whore, uh, Seductress by Neale Sourna (Aug 14, 2007)
| Formats | Price | New | Used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $6.25 |
6.
NCADv3n1--Neale Sourna's North Coast Academies' Diary--3SexViews: Ross, Laila, Sascha by Neale Sourna (Dec 17, 2008)
| Formats | Price | New | Used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $6.25 |
7.
NCAD--v3n1.3--Neale Sourna's North Coast Academies' Diary--Ross: My Daughter's Anal [Asshole] Cherry by Neale Sourna (Dec 25, 2008)
| Formats | Price | New | Used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $5.99 |
8.
NCAD--v3n1.2--Neale Sourna's North Coast Academies' Diary--Laila: Daddy's Willing Little Slut by Neale Sourna (Dec 23, 2008)
| Formats | Price | New | Used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $5.99 |
9.
Dia's Coach (1) by Neale Sourna (Dec 5, 2011)
| Formats | Price | New | Used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $4.97 |
10.
Three - By Invitation Only by Neale Sourna (Sep 8, 2012)
| Formats | Price | New | Used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $3.97 |
11.
Neale Sourna's North Coast Academies' Diary, Volume 1, #1--Laila: Cozy With Daddy by Neale Sourna (Apr 9, 2007)
| Formats | Price | New | Used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $3.50 | ||||
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $3.39 |
12.
Neale Sourna's North Coast Academies' Diary, Volume 1, #2--Yune: Suck My - - - - by Neale Sourna (Apr 9, 2007)
| Formats | Price | New | Used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $2.99 |
13.
Hesitation by Neale Sourna (Sep 16, 2012)
| Formats | Price | New | Used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $1.97 |
14.
All Along the Watchtower: Submerged (A Novel Excerpt) by Neale Sourna (Aug 27, 2009)
| Formats | Price | New | Used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $1.97 |
15.
Steve's Monkey's Paw & MORE by Neale Sourna (Aug 14, 2007)
| Formats | Price | New | Used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $1.95 | ||||
| Paperback
Order in the next 9 hours to get it by Thursday, Nov 8.
Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping.
|
$3.95 | $3.72 | $3.72 |
16.
Rough-Me Dot Com by Neale Sourna (Sep 25, 2011)
| Formats | Price | New | Used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $1.50 |
17.
Temple and Silent Tommy: Bedrooms [A Post Second World War (WWII) Love Story/Novel Excerpt] by Neale Sourna (Oct 24, 2011)
| Formats | Price | New | Used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $1.00 |
18.
The Freelancer by Neale Sourna (Sep 9, 2011)
| Formats | Price | New | Used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $1.00 |
19.
No Wedding Night by Neale Sourna (Feb 26, 2012)
| Formats | Price | New | Used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $0.99 |
20.
Seduce Her Like Keanu Reeves (3 Articles: Seduce, 10 Seduction Secrets, List of Bad Lovers) by Neale Sourna (Aug 17, 2009)
| Formats | Price | New | Used | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle Edition Auto-delivered wirelessly | $0.67 |
« Previous | Page: 1 2 | Next »
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

CD cover Sarah Vaughan Sings the Mancini Songbook