On writing, erotica, character, soul stealers, philosophies, sensualities, and inspirations. And How To, if I can.
-- www.Neale-Sourna.com, www.PIE-Percept.com, http://www.ProjectKeanu.com, www.AuthorsDen.com/nealesourna, www.CafeShops.com/NealeSourna, & www.Writing-Naked.com, www.CuntSinger.com
Monday, October 22, 2012
The Slippery Slope of E-Originals, Part 1 and 2_October 14, 2012 | Richard Curtis
In the last year a number of major publishers have begun offering
authors contracts for “e-originals” – books released originally – and
exclusively – in e-book format. Though this is a logical step in the
evolution of traditional publishing houses from tangible to virtual
formats, the deflationary nature of its business model poses a serious
threat to author earning power. Less obvious but ultimately more
dangerous is the implosive effect the shift may have on the publishing
companies themselves and the people who work for them.
What’s Wrong with Paperback Originals?
The first and obvious question is, what’s wrong with paperbacks
books, that publishers are abandoning them in favor of digital
originals? The fact is that in the past fifteen or twenty years, mass
market paperback books have transformed from a breeding ground for fresh
talent to an exclusive club for bestselling authors.
The reasons for this metamorphosis are complex (you can read about them in The Rise and Fall of the Mass Market Paperback: Part 1, Part 2),
but in essence the ruthless math of an industry based on the
returnability of books has made it almost impossible for fresh talent to
develop over time in the nursery of original paperbacks. Though many
promising genre authors, especially romance writers, continue to be
introduced in mass market paperback, the sales thresholds they must
achieve in order to make a profit for their publishers have risen to
almost unattainable heights.
Cue e-book originals.
At first blush, e-originals appear to be the perfect way for
publishers to pull authors out of this death spiral, for many of the
costs of manufacturing and distribution are lower or negligible. You
would think that the savings would be passed along to authors in the
form of higher advances and royalties. So far, that has proven far from
true. Why?
At the present time, the so-called “standard” e-book royalty paid by
the Big Six legacy publishers – Random House, Hachette, HarperCollins,
Simon & Schuster, Penguin and Macmillan – is 25% of net receipts.
Though many independent e-book publishers (including, full disclosure,
my own firm E-Reads) pay 50% or higher, the Big Six justify the 25%
royalty on the strength of the high cost of manufacturing the print
books that serve as the launch pad for their e-book reprints. If it
costs X thousand dollars for a publisher to produce and publish a
hardcover book, publishers reason, a portion of those costs should be
allocated to the production of the e-book.
Though many authors deny that assumption, let’s grant it for the sake
of argument. It is, however, much harder to grant it in the case of
original e-books. Though the cost of producing e-books is higher than
most lay people may think (see Are Publishers Making a Killing on E-Books?, Part 1 and Part 2), it is considerably lower than the cost of producing print books.
Publishers, however, don’t see it that way. They contend that they
are not yet selling e-books in sufficient quantities to merit advances
commensurate with those paid for paperback originals. Advances for
e-originals are therefore dropping by half or more of those paid for
print originals, and in some instances publishers are offering no
advances at all. To compound the injury, they remain adamant about the
25% net royalty.
Do the Math
It might help to do the math. If a publisher charges $3.99 for an
e-original and collects on the average of 60% of the list price from the
retailer, that comes to $2.40. 25% of that sum, $.60, goes to the
author. In order to make $5000, a reasonable minimum for three to six
months’ work, that book would have to sell over 8,000 e-book units. Most
publishers would deny that that is a realistic projection. They are
therefore offering a good deal less than $5000 advances, and in some
cases are offering no advances at all.
From this, as comedian Jackie Mason might say, you cannot make a
living. Or, to put it another way, the economics of e-originals
published by big houses are so marginal that many authors might now be
tempted to jump to on the independent bandwagon, where 50%, 60% and 70%
royalties beckon to the self-published.
What is the solution? Obviously, if Big Six publishers want to retain
quality authors they may have no choice but to raise their royalty
rates and pay decent advances.
In the second installment of this post we’ll look at the unintended
consequences facing Big Six publishers who are switching to e-originals
In the first part of this article
I described a fundamental shift under way in the book industry from
original paperbacks to original e-books – “e-originals” in Publisher
Speak – and its depressing effect on author compensation. These deals
point to sharp reductions in advances and royalties and acceleration of
the flight of authors from traditional to self-publication.
Impact of E-Originals on Publishers
The impact of the shift on publishers themselves is less quantifiable. It is, however, potentially far more devastating.
You can define publishers in many ways but their unique claim and
strong attraction for authors is that they distribute printed books in
brick and mortar stores. By forsaking the very element that defines and
distinguishes them, however, publishers are at risk of becoming unmoored
from the comfortable physical terrain of the book business and floating
up like a balloon into the unfamiliar and turbulent stratosphere of
Cloud publishing.
I say “unfamiliar” terrain. Though legacy publishers have adapted
admirably to the challenge of digital publishing, few who work in the
industry them have truly grasped the stupendous upheavals that come with
full commitment to all-digital publishing, and who can blame them for
being in denial? The truth is that a purely digital book industry is
nowhere near as dependent on people, places and things as the
traditional one.
An Author, A Reader, A Server
Boiled down to its essence, publishing can be defined simply as an
author, a reader and a server. The e-book publishers that have sprouted
up in the last decade have shed many of the extra trappings that
characterize traditional publishers. Pure e-book companies travel light
and fast and can turn on a dime because they are not burdened by the
complex support structure and personnel that characterize the old
regime. In order to become a purely e-book operation, a conventional
publisher would have to release most of its staff and move to far
smaller quarters, for many tasks performed by ten in the old business,
such as sales, distribution, art direction and royalty processing can be
performed by one or two in the new one.
Though this eventuality is far off there are already signs that
publishers are facing this relentless, disintermediated future and
scaling down to meet the challenge. But the havoc wreaked on their brand
and identities if they go 100% digital could be very, very dear. Today
it’s easy to distinguish Simon & Schuster, HarperCollins or
Macmillan from Rosetta, Open Road or E-Reads. Tomorrow it may not be.
For these reasons it would be wise for publishers to pause and reflect before setting foot on the slippery slope of e-originals.
Richard Curtis
This blog post was originally published by Digital Book World as The Slippery Slope of E-Originals Part 2
About Richard Curtis
Richard Curtis is a leading New York literary agent (www.curtisagency.com) who foresaw the Digital Book Revolution and launched an e-book publishing company early in 2000. E-Reads (www.ereads.com)
is one of the foremost independent e-book publishers in the industry,
specializing in reprints of genre fiction by leading authors in their
fields. Curtis is also a well-known authors advocate, author of numerous
works of fiction and nonfiction including several books about the
publishing industry, and prolific blogger – see his hundreds of other
blog posts here.
No comments:
Post a Comment